Skip to content
WritingOpenAlt AI Labs

A one-page brief you would sign, written with Claude

Claude path, stage 2. Use Claude to research a real question people in Kyrgyzstan keep asking, then write a one-page brief in Kyrgyz or Russian where every fact links to a source you opened yourself.

  1. 1Learn
  2. 2Do
  3. 3Submit
  4. 4Results
Category
Writing
Lesson
Self-paced
Effort
~3h
Prize
Free
Closes in
 

Learn

Take the course first

This stage starts with Claude 101, a free course by Anthropic on the Anthropic Academy site. It covers everyday work with Claude and its core features. The course is in English and self-paced. Come back here when you finish it.

Anthropic Academy is made and run by Anthropic. Alt AI Labs is not affiliated with Anthropic: we link to the course and set this challenge.

How to research with Claude

  • Give it the situation. Say who the brief is for and what they need to decide.
  • Give it documents. Upload or paste the official pages you found. Claude is much more reliable working from text you gave it than from memory.
  • Ask for sources, then open them. A link Claude names is a lead, not proof. Open each one and check that it says what Claude claims.
  • Ask it to criticise its own draft. "Which sentences in this brief are you least sure about?" is a useful prompt.
  • Write in the reader's language. Draft in Kyrgyz or Russian directly, or ask Claude to translate and then fix the wording yourself.

What counts as a source

A government site, a university's own page, a law, an official announcement or a primary document. A blog post or a forum answer can point you to one, but it does not count on its own.

Before you submit

Share the doc as "Anyone with the link can view" and open it in a private window to check.

Finish the lesson to unlock submitting.

Sign in to start learning

Do

about 3h of work

The task

Claude can read long documents, compare sources and draft fast. It can also state a wrong date with total confidence. This challenge is about getting the first without the second. Pick a real question that people around you keep asking, such as how to register as a sole proprietor, which universities teach computer science in English, or how to apply for a student visa to Korea. Use Claude to research it and draft a one-page brief in Kyrgyz or Russian. Then check every fact yourself and link it to the page you checked it against. Keep a short log of the prompts that shaped the brief and of at least one thing Claude got wrong.

Deliverables

  1. 01The brief: one page in Kyrgyz or Russian, in a shared Google Doc
  2. 02A source link next to every number, name, date and rule in the brief
  3. 03A short log in the same doc: the three prompts that mattered most and why
  4. 04At least one mistake Claude made, and how you found it

Acceptance criteria

Judged against exactly these

  • The question is real and useful to people in Kyrgyzstan or Central Asia
  • The brief fits on one page and is written in Kyrgyz or Russian
  • Every number, name, date and rule links to an official or primary source that supports it
  • The log shows at least one specific mistake by Claude and the source that corrected it
  • The prompts in the log give Claude context, a clear task and a format, not just a topic
  • No personal data about anyone appears in the brief or the log

Rules

  • Complete the lesson first. The submit form unlocks once you mark it done.
  • Submit a link to your work: a public GitHub repo or PR for code challenges; YouTube, Google Drive or Docs, Figma, Notion or a live site for everything else.
  • AI tools are allowed and encouraged. Plagiarised or copied work is disqualified.
  • The work must be made during the challenge window. For code, the commit history must show it.
  • An AI reviewer pre-scores every entry against the acceptance criteria. A human makes the final decision.
  • On payout, Alt AI Labs receives a licence to use the winning work (MIT for code). Non-winning entries stay yours.
  • Do not include secrets, API keys or anyone's personal data.
clauderesearchwritingfact-checking

Submit

Sign in and complete the lesson to submit. Entry is free.

Sign in

Results

  1. 01

    AI pre-score

    AI reviews your write-up against the acceptance criteria. It cannot open your link, so explain your work clearly.

  2. 02

    Human decision

    A human reviews the work itself and makes the final call. The AI score is advisory.

  3. 03

    Win

    There is no cash prize. Winning work is shown to the organization behind the challenge.

Posted by

Alt AI Labs